A person who has never experienced authentic love does not recognize it as safe.

---

A Person Who Feels Unloved Becomes and Unloved Person

Ding-dong-ditchers of love

Some people live their entire lives without ever feeling truly loved. Rejecting true love.This feeling of being unloved becomes their reality even if it’s just a perception that stemmed from experiences or life circumstances. They may function, achieve, and even form relationships, yet struggle to accept genuine affection. This is why we have so much promiscuity and perversion on this world.

A person who grows up feeling unloved, learns to protect their heart by rejecting love and doing what they believe is protecting heart from pain. Sadly to say many never get to experience the beauty of true, pure, authentic love.

When love is freely given to them, they question it, resist it, or retreat from it. This reaction goes beyond a matter of arrogance or indifference but of conditioning.

A person who has never experienced authentic love does not recognize it as safe. Instead, love feels unfamiliar, destabilizing, and even threatening. To understand why this happens, we must explore how early experiences shape emotional development, attachments, and the brain’s perception of relational safety.

Let’s Read On

The Foundations of Emotional Security

From infancy, humans depend on stable emotional bonds for survival and psychological growth. British psychiatrist John Bowlby (1969) and later researcher Mary Ainsworth (1978) described this through attachment theory. This is the idea that early caregiver relationships form the blueprint for how individuals experience closeness, trust, and intimacy. Now we know that can work miracles in each one of our lives, however without surrender and some self-work our lives will be shaped and lived on by this blueprint.

Research have shown that when caregivers are responsive and emotionally available, children develop secure attachment, learning that love is consistent and dependable. They learn that they can be vulnerable and run to those who love them when things are good, bad, or uncertain and trust that they will be accepted, loved, and care for.

When caregivers are unpredictable, unstable, critical, or neglectful, children often develop insecure attachment styles, and become avoidant, anxious, or disorganized. These patterns become internal templates that persist into adulthood, influencing how people give and receive love (Mikulincer & Shaver, 2016). The become that which they fear the most.

For the “unloved person,” early attachment experiences were often marked by inconsistency or emotional absence. They learned that love could not be trusted — and as adults, they replicate that belief, even subconsciously.

Childhood Adversity and the Formation of the Unloved Self

The term Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs), introduced by Felitti et al. (1998), refers to traumatic or stressful events in childhood — such as abuse, neglect, abandonment, rejection, or household dysfunction — that have long-term effects on mental and physical health.

Studies show that individuals with high ACE scores are more likely to experience depression, anxiety, difficulties in relationships, and lower emotional regulation (Anda et al., 2006).

For a child to feel unloved, adversity may not always take the form of overt abuse. Sometimes it is experiencing, emotional neglect. Emotional neglect happens when a person experiences a lack of warmth, encouragement, or attunement. The message received is a quiet and powerful pain that has the ability to mark a person for life. What they hear is: “I am not worth loving.”

That internal narrative becomes self-sustaining. What happens in these individuals’ life is that even when later confronted with affection, success, or care, the unloved person’s mind filters it through disbelief. Arrogance becomes the wall of protection, a barrier. The brain, wired by years of emotional scarcity, cannot reconcile genuine love with its learned expectation of rejection. So before they are rejected, they reject. They become ding-dong-ditchers of love. Experts in going from door to door for attention and the minute they get what they want, they flee.

They Want Deliverance From The Wound of Rejection

But They Have a Psychological Conflict with Love

When someone who has never been loved encounters true love, it creates what psychologies recognize as cognitive dissonance. This is a mental clash between what they believe (“I am unlovable”) (“Unworthy”) and what they experience (“Someone Loves Me”), (“Could this be Real?”).

Research in social psychology shows that when core beliefs are challenged, individuals often reject new evidence rather than revise their worldview (Festinger, 1957). In the context of relationships, this means that being loved can feel unbearably overwhelming to someone who has learned to equate love with pain or loss.

Some of their behaviors may be:

• Acting out to seek attention
• Distrust positive attention (“You’ll leave eventually”).
• Test the relationship through withdrawal or argument.
• Emotional abandonment, rejection and withdrawal.
• Interpreting consistency as control or manipulation.
• Feeling of guilt or undeserving when treated with kindness.

These acts of coldness are a defense mechanisms built to preserve emotional safety.

To “the unloved person”, love is not soothing; it is destabilizing. A sense of lack of control. Being vulnerable is petrifying to them.

Making an Unloved Individual

A parent’s chronic death in the family, financial losses, changes and losses of friendships, a parent’s illness, mental disorder, or emotional instability can profoundly distort a child’s understanding of love. In such households, survival often outweighs emotional connection. Children may become caretakers, mediators, or silent observers in order to maintain family balance. This phenomenon is known as parentification (Chase, 1999).

This dynamic places an immense burden on children, as they often feel responsible for their parents’ and in occasions their siblings well-being and emotional state. As a result, their own needs for affection, validation, and guidance are frequently overshadowed. The roles they take on may lead to a lack of healthy childhood experiences, which are crucial for emotional development.

Moreover, these children may struggle with forming their own identities, as they have been conditioned to prioritize others’ needs over their own. This can result in long-term emotional and psychological issues, including anxiety, depression, and difficulties in establishing boundaries in relationships. The family environment may also breed feelings of guilt and shame for the child, who might believe they are inadequate or that they are to blame for the familial dysfunction.

In navigating these complex relationships, such children often learn to suppress their own emotions, leading to a disconnected sense of self. They may also develop maladaptive coping mechanisms to manage the distressing atmosphere at home. Instead of a nurturing environment, their upbringing can become a source of confusion and pain, shaping their understanding of intimacy and trust in ways that could hinder their future relationships.

Ultimately, recognizing the implications of family dysfunction and emotional neglect is crucial, so that support systems can be established to aid these children in reclaiming their emotional health and fostering healthier connections as they grow into adulthood.

While parentified children may appear mature and responsible, they often carry deep emotional deprivation. Their own needs were postponed indefinitely, replaced by the duty to protect or manage others.

As adults, these individuals tend to confuse love with obligation. Rejecting love is their way of avoiding responsibilities, of protecting themselves so they can enjoy their lives as an adult. When someone offers care freely, they experience guilt rather than comfort. Many times they connect the demonstration of love with the burden to have to neglect or bury their own needs. Their emotional reflex is to withdraw before they “owe” anyone affection in return.

They don’t reject love’s value, but over time, this pattern reinforces isolation, because they have never known it without conditions.

An unhealed child – is a wounded adult child. An unloved person who find it easier to buy love and temporary affection with love bombing and even prefers doing so over committing to receiving genuine love.

The Neurobiology of Being Unloved

Neuroscientific research supports what psychology has long observed: chronic emotional neglect reshapes the brain’s stress and reward systems. Studies using neuroimaging have shown that individuals who experienced early relational deprivation often exhibit reduced activity in brain regions associated with reward and emotional regulation, such as the amygdala and prefrontal cortex (Teicher & Samson, 2016).

This means that when love or comfort is offered, the brain may not interpret it as safety or pleasure, it may register it as uncertainty or even a threat. The physiological stress response activates, prompting avoidance or emotional shutdown.

Simply put, love feels unsafe because of how the nervous system has learned to survive.

Faith and the Path Toward Healing

For many, healing from a history of feeling unloved requires more than psychology, it demands meaning. Faith can play a critical role in this process. From a Christian psychological perspective, the concept of unconditional love (agape) provides a counter-narrative to the learned belief of unworthiness.

Scripture describes divine love as constant and undeserved: “We love because He first loved us” (1 John 4:19). Experiencing or internalizing this type of love; through prayer, faith communities, or reflection, can begin to rewrite the emotional script.

Therapeutically, this aligns with reparenting and self-compassion models in psychology, which emphasize rebuilding trust, safety, and self-worth through consistent positive experiences. Over time, with both faith and therapy, the unloved person can learn to reinterpreting love, from danger, to stability.

ARA: Heading Toward Restoration

ARA is an acrostic that I use to explain the process of healing for the unloved person that involves three central steps:

1. Awareness: Recognizing how early experiences shaped their understanding of love.
2. Relearning: Building their own relationships. A personal, therapeutic and spiritual model that teaches them consistency without condition.
3. Acceptance: Allowing themselves to receive affection without attaching fear, guilt, or shame.

This process is rarely quick. But research in neuroplasticity shows that the brain can change throughout life; new experiences of safety and love can literally rewire emotional pathways (Davidson & McEwen, 2012).

Healing, then, is possible, but it requires patience, honesty, and the courage to stay present to receive love that no longer feels like danger.

Conclusion

An unloved person is not incapable of loving; they are conflicted by it. Their history has taught them that love equals vulnerability and loss, and so they protect themselves through withdrawal or skepticism. But these defenses, while once necessary, now perpetuate loneliness.

God’s love can help them break free and heal so they don’t continue bleeding all over those who love them the most.

Both psychology and faith converge on the same truth: love cannot be fully received until it is first believed to be safe. Through understanding, therapy, and the experience of unconditional acceptance, whether it is from others, from faith, or from within, even the most unloved person can learn to love and be loved in return.

---

References:

• Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Anda, R. F., Felitti, V. J., Bremner, J. D., et al. (2006). The enduring effects of abuse and related adverse experiences in childhood. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 256(3), 174–186.
• Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.
• Chase, N. D. (Ed.). (1999). Burdened children: Theory, research, and treatment of parentification. SAGE Publications.
• Davidson, R. J., & McEwen, B. S. (2012). Social influences on neuroplasticity: Stress and interventions to promote well-being. Nature Neuroscience, 15(5), 689–695.
• Felitti, V. J., et al. (1998). Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14(4), 245–258.
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
• Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2016). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
• Teicher, M. H., & Samson, J. A. (2016). Annual Research Review: Enduring neurobiological effects of childhood abuse and neglect. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57(3), 241–266.

---

It is my prayer that you have enjoyed this piece. May you be loved, and find yourself able to love beyond your set-backs and hang-ups.

©️2025 Denise Kilby New Hope MHCLC. All rights reserved.

---